26/03/2025 2:52 am
Topic starter
Notifications
Clear all
GPU Forum
1
Posts
2
Users
0
Reactions
800
Views
0
How much is truly required for seamless 8K workflows? While 12GB may suffice for 4K, does the exponential increase in data with 8K necessitate 24GB or even 48GB of VRAM for smooth timeline performance and rendering? Given that GPU RAM impacts performance, what VRAM capacity provides the best balance between cost and diminishing returns when editing 8K footage?
1 Answer
4
14/02/2026 6:15 pm
Ok so, I've been trying to figure this out myself since I just started dabbling in higher res footage. From what I can tell, 12GB is basically the bare minimum for 4K these days, but 8K is a whole different beast. If you dont have enough VRAM, your software will probably just crash or lag like crazy when you start adding effects or color grading. Here is what I've found looking at the different options: * NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 (24GB): This seems to be the sweet spot. It has enough room for the timeline and rendering without hitting a wall, and honestly, the price is high but way better than the pro-grade cards.
* NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super (16GB): You might save some money here, but I've heard 16GB can still feel a bit tight if you're doing heavy noise reduction on 8K clips.
* NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation (48GB): This is like, top tier for studios. But is it worth the huge cost? Probably not for most of us unless you're doing massive 3D renders at the same time. Tbh, 24GB seems like the best balance for performance vs cost. Anything less might frustrate you, but do you think the jump to 48GB is even noticeable for just standard editing?
